Hi Krzysztof,
On 2017-01-17 18:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Store the pointer to slave device, which requested our channel. It will be
later used to implement runtime PM of PL330 DMA controller. Although
DMA channels might be requested many times, each DMA peripheral channel is
physically dedicated only for specific hardware, so there should be only
one slave device for each channel.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Any particular reason for removing my Reviewed-by? Any changes here?
No changes here. I'm sorry, the tag got lost during rebase.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
---
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
index b6b2cc912380..c77a3494659c 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
@@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ struct dma_pl330_chan {
/* for runtime pm tracking */
bool active;
+ struct device *slave;
};
struct pl330_dmac {
@@ -2093,6 +2094,14 @@ static struct dma_chan *of_dma_pl330_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
if (chan_id >= pl330->num_peripherals)
return NULL;
+ if (!pl330->peripherals[chan_id].slave) {
+ pl330->peripherals[chan_id].slave = slave;
+ } else if (pl330->peripherals[chan_id].slave != slave) {
+ dev_err(pl330->ddma.dev,
+ "Can't use same channel with multiple slave devices!\n");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
return dma_get_slave_channel(&pl330->peripherals[chan_id].chan);
}
--
1.9.1
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
