Hello Marek, On 01/10/2017 04:48 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Javier, > > On 2017-01-09 17:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Marek, >> >> On 01/09/2017 05:34 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >>> There are no Exynos4212 based boards in mainline, so there is no need to >>> keep additional files for SoCs, which are never used. This patch removes >>> support for Exynos4212 SoCs and moves previously shared Exynos4412 >>> definitions to a single file to simplify future maintenance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> Patch looks good to me. >> >> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> There are still a lot of references to Exynos4212 after this patch though. >> I see Kconfig symbols, macros, SoC specific logic and compatibles strings >> in Exynos platform code, drivers and DT bindings. >> >> Are you planning to also remove these as a follow-up? > > Yes, I plan to send follow-ups, especially for clocks, pincontrol drivers and > Kconfigs. However I don't plan to change compatible strings to keep > so called compatibility with old dtbs as requested by Krzysztof some time ago. > Drivers for Exynos4412 hw modules will still use "exynos4x12", "exynos4212" > and "exynos4412" strings as they do now. > I see, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. > Best regards Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |