Hi Mark,
On 2016-12-31 19:26, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 01:19:31PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Requesting a DMA channel might be a time consuming operation, so there is
no need to acquire and release DMA channel for each SPI transfer.
This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
It fails to apply because of missing commit
6f8dc9d481759b428a8cb6a17b83821451415ba9
("spi: s3c64xx: Do not use platform_data for DMA parameters") in your
spi-next,
which is already in v4.10-rc1 and came through dma-engine tree. My patch
depends on
it and removing this dependency will make a merge conflict later while
merging to
Linus if I rebase directly onto your spi-next.
IMHO it would be better either to merge v4.10-rc1 to your spi-next
branch or at
least apply the mentioned patch to your branch before applying this one.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
