Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bartilomiej,

On 27 December 2016 at 19:32, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, December 10, 2016 06:38:36 PM Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs and SoC revisions.
>> This patch intends to provide initialization code for all these functionalities,
>> at the same time it provides some sysfs entries for accessing these information
>> to user-space.
>>
>> This driver uses existing binding for exynos-chipid.
>>
>> CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [m.szyprowski: for suggestion and code snippet of product_id_to_soc_id]
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig         |   5 ++
>>  drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile        |   1 +
>>  drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..cf0128b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
>
> [...]
>
>> +/**
>> + *  exynos_chipid_early_init: Early chipid initialization
>> + */
>> +int __init exynos_chipid_early_init(void)
>> +{
>> +     struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> +     struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> +     struct device_node *root;
>> +     struct device_node *np;
>> +     void __iomem *exynos_chipid_base;
>> +     const struct of_device_id *match;
>> +     u32 product_id;
>> +     u32 revision;
>> +
>> +     np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL,
>> +                     of_exynos_chipid_ids, &match);
>> +     if (!np)
>> +             return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +     exynos_chipid_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>
> of_node_put(np) is missing here.
>

OK.

>> +     if (!exynos_chipid_base)
>> +             return PTR_ERR(exynos_chipid_base);
>
> PTR_ERR use here is incorrect - of_iomap() returns valid pointer or
> NULL.  Please just return -NODEV on of_iomap() failure.
>

OK.
Thanks for review. I will address these issues in next version.

Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey

> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux