On 10.12.2016 14:08, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs and SoC revisions. > This patch intends to provide initialization code for all these functionalities, > at the same time it provides some sysfs entries for accessing these information > to user-space. > > This driver uses existing binding for exynos-chipid. > > CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > [m.szyprowski: for suggestion and code snippet of product_id_to_soc_id] > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 5 ++ > drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig > index 2455339..f9ab858 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig > @@ -14,4 +14,9 @@ config EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS > bool "Exynos PM domains" if COMPILE_TEST > depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS || COMPILE_TEST > > +config EXYNOS_CHIPID > + bool "Exynos Chipid controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST > + depends on (ARM && ARCH_EXYNOS) || ((ARM || ARM64) && COMPILE_TEST) > + select SOC_BUS > + > endif > diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile > index 3619f2e..2a8a85e 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU) += exynos-pmu.o exynos3250-pmu.o exynos4-pmu.o \ > exynos5250-pmu.o exynos5420-pmu.o > obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS) += pm_domains.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_CHIPID) += exynos-chipid.o > diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..cf0128b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c > @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > + * http://www.samsung.com/ > + * > + * EXYNOS - CHIP ID support > + * Author: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/sys_soc.h> > + > +#define EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK (0xF << 4) > +#define EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK (0xF << 0) > +#define EXYNOS_REV_MASK (EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK | EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK) > + > +static const struct exynos_soc_id { > + const char *name; > + unsigned int id; > + unsigned int mask; > +} soc_ids[] = { > + { "EXYNOS3250", 0xE3472000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS4210", 0x43200000, 0xFFFE0000 }, > + { "EXYNOS4212", 0x43220000, 0xFFFE0000 }, > + { "EXYNOS4412", 0xE4412000, 0xFFFE0000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5250", 0x43520000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5260", 0xE5260000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5410", 0xE5410000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5420", 0xE5420000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5440", 0xE5440000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5800", 0xE5422000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS7420", 0xE7420000, 0xFFFFF000 }, > + { "EXYNOS5433", 0xE5433000, 0xFFFFF000 }, I wonder why there are different masks in case of Exynos42*? In specs I have access to mask is always 0xFFFFF000. > +}; > + > +static const char * __init product_id_to_soc_id(unsigned int product_id) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(soc_ids); i++) > + if ((product_id & soc_ids[i].mask) == soc_ids[i].id) > + return soc_ids[i].name; > + return "UNKNOWN"; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id of_exynos_chipid_ids[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-chipid", > + }, > + {}, > +}; > + > +/** > + * exynos_chipid_early_init: Early chipid initialization > + */ > +int __init exynos_chipid_early_init(void) > +{ > + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr; > + struct soc_device *soc_dev; > + struct device_node *root; > + struct device_node *np; > + void __iomem *exynos_chipid_base; > + const struct of_device_id *match; > + u32 product_id; > + u32 revision; > + > + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, > + of_exynos_chipid_ids, &match); > + if (!np) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + exynos_chipid_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > + > + if (!exynos_chipid_base) > + return PTR_ERR(exynos_chipid_base); > + > + product_id = readl_relaxed(exynos_chipid_base); > + revision = product_id & EXYNOS_REV_MASK; > + iounmap(exynos_chipid_base); > + > + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!soc_dev_attr) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + soc_dev_attr->family = "Samsung Exynos"; > + > + root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); > + of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine); > + of_node_put(root); > + > + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%x", revision); > + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = product_id_to_soc_id(product_id); > + > + > + pr_info("Exynos: CPU[%s] CPU_REV[0x%x] Detected\n", > + product_id_to_soc_id(product_id), revision); I wonder if it wouldn't be good to log numeric value of whole PRO_ID register, this way we will have also useful log for chips not know to soc_ids array. It will show also some missing bits: masked bits, package_information and reserved bit. Btw. package_information can be used to distinguish S5PC210 and S5PV310. And small optimization, you can reuse soc_dev_attr->soc_id instead of calling the same function again. And finally all log could be moved after soc_device_register, this way you can use: struc device *dev = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev); dev_info(dev, ...); Regards Andrzej > + > + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr); > + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) { > + kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision); > + kfree_const(soc_dev_attr->soc_id); > + kfree(soc_dev_attr); > + return PTR_ERR(soc_dev); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > +early_initcall(exynos_chipid_early_init); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |