Hi Krzysztof,
On Wednesday 09 November 2016 12:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:43PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> Lets remove static mapping of SCU SFR mainly used in CORTEX-A9 SoC based boards.
>> Instead use mapping from device tree node of SCU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 22 ------------------
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 2 --
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 5 ++--
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 13 ++++-------
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 4 ----
>> 7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
>> index 9424a8a..dd5d8e8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
>> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ extern void exynos_cpu_restore_register(void);
>> extern void exynos_pm_central_suspend(void);
>> extern int exynos_pm_central_resume(void);
>> extern void exynos_enter_aftr(void);
>> +extern int exynos_scu_enable(void);
>>
>> extern struct cpuidle_exynos_data cpuidle_coupled_exynos_data;
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> index 757fc11..fa08ef9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> @@ -28,15 +28,6 @@
>>
>> #include "common.h"
>>
>> -static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = {
>> - {
>> - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_COREPERI_BASE,
>> - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_COREPERI),
>> - .length = SZ_8K,
>> - .type = MT_DEVICE,
>> - },
>> -};
>> -
>> static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
>> .name = "exynos_cpuidle",
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
>> @@ -99,17 +90,6 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_chipid(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * exynos_map_io
>> - *
>> - * register the standard cpu IO areas
>> - */
>> -static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
>> -{
>> - if (soc_is_exynos4())
>> - iotable_init(exynos4_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_iodesc));
>> -}
>> -
>> static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>> {
>> debug_ll_io_init();
>> @@ -118,8 +98,6 @@ static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>>
>> /* detect cpu id and rev. */
>> s5p_init_cpu(S5P_VA_CHIPID);
>> -
>> - exynos_map_io();
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
>> index 5fb0040..0eef407 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
>> @@ -18,6 +18,4 @@
>>
>> #define EXYNOS_PA_CHIPID 0x10000000
>>
>> -#define EXYNOS4_PA_COREPERI 0x10500000
>> -
>> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_MAP_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
>> index a5d6841..94405c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
>> @@ -168,6 +168,27 @@ int exynos_cluster_power_state(int cluster)
>> S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * exynos_scu_enable : enables SCU for Cortex-A9 based system
>> + * returns 0 on success else non-zero error code
>> + */
>> +int exynos_scu_enable(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + void __iomem *scu_base;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-scu");
>> + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> + if (!scu_base) {
>> + pr_err("%s failed to map scu_base\n", __func__);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + scu_enable(scu_base);
>> + iounmap(scu_base);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void __iomem *cpu_boot_reg_base(void)
>> {
>> if (soc_is_exynos4210() && samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
>> @@ -224,11 +245,6 @@ static void write_pen_release(int val)
>> sync_cache_w(&pen_release);
>> }
>>
>> -static void __iomem *scu_base_addr(void)
>> -{
>> - return (void __iomem *)(S5P_VA_SCU);
>> -}
>> -
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
>>
>> static void exynos_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
>> @@ -393,9 +409,11 @@ static void __init exynos_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>>
>> exynos_set_delayed_reset_assertion(true);
>>
>> - if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
>> - scu_enable(scu_base_addr());
>> -
>> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
>> + /* if exynos_scu_enable fails, return */
>> + if (exynos_scu_enable())
>> + return;
>
> Ohhh, someone (e.g. out-of-tree DTS) might be surprised with this.
> Please mention such change of behaviour in the commit log (describe the
> possible impact of this commit).
>
OK, I will add small note, for this change of behavior in commit log.
>> + }
>> /*
>> * Write the address of secondary startup into the
>> * system-wide flags register. The boot monitor waits
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> index 487295f..23db2af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>
> Why do you need this include? Was it coming from mach/map.h?
>
Its not required. This is leftover of patchset v1, and can be removed.
>> #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h>
>> #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h>
>>
>> @@ -26,8 +27,6 @@
>> #include <asm/suspend.h>
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>
>> -#include <mach/map.h>
>> -
>> #include "common.h"
>>
>> static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void)
>> @@ -177,7 +176,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void)
>> cpu_suspend(0, exynos_aftr_finisher);
>>
>> if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
>> - scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
>> + exynos_scu_enable();
>> if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS)
>> exynos_cpu_restore_register();
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
>> index 06332f6..c73c857 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
>> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
>> #include <asm/smp_scu.h>
>> #include <asm/suspend.h>
>>
>> -#include <mach/map.h>
>> -
>> #include <plat/pm-common.h>
>>
>> #include "common.h"
>> @@ -461,12 +459,11 @@ static void exynos_pm_resume(void)
>> /* For release retention */
>> exynos_pm_release_retention();
>>
>> - if (cpuid == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
>> - scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
>> -
>> - if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS
>> - && cpuid == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
>> - exynos_cpu_restore_register();
>> + if (cpuid == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
>> + exynos_scu_enable();
>> + if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS)
>> + exynos_cpu_restore_register();
>
> It does not look right. I think you changed the logic here. Previously
> if CPU != A9, then call_firmware_op() was executed. Now it won't be.
>
Yes, my bad, I understood it in different way. I will correct this and
submit V3, after addressing all your comments.
> BTW, don't respin patchset with the same version number. This is
> basically v3. To me, increasing version number is always welcomed. It
> makes dealign with patches easier.
>
OK. I will take care in future.
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
