On Saturday, November 5, 2016 5:33:47 PM CET Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> This patch enables chipid driver for ARCH_EXYNOS and refactors
> machine code for using chipid driver for identification of
> SoC ID and SoC rev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 92 ----------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 31 ----------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 10 +--
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 21 -------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 22 ++++---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 41 ++++++++-----
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/cpu.c | 14 -----
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 -
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 2 -
> 10 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
Nice code removal!
> -
> static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
> {
> debug_ll_io_init();
> -
> - of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_chipid, NULL);
> -
> - /* detect cpu id and rev. */
> - s5p_init_cpu(S5P_VA_CHIPID);
> }
This is now the default for .map_io, so you can remove the rest of the
function as well and do
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 757fc11de30d..808872981f45 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EXYNOS_DT, "SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)")
.l2c_aux_val = 0x3c400001,
.l2c_aux_mask = 0xc20fffff,
.smp = smp_ops(exynos_smp_ops),
- .map_io = exynos_init_io,
.init_early = exynos_firmware_init,
.init_irq = exynos_init_irq,
.init_machine = exynos_dt_machine_init,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> index fd6da54..a9f8504e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(unsigned long mode)
> writel_relaxed(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume_ns),
> sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x24);
> writel_relaxed(EXYNOS_AFTR_MAGIC, sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x20);
> - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) {
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) {
> flush_cache_all();
> exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_SAVE, OP_TYPE_CORE,
> SMC_POWERSTATE_IDLE, 0);
I'd rather not see a proliferation of many such checks. Please try
to rework it to have fewer checks, e.g. by having a separate instance
of "struct firmware_ops" for each incompatible variant and making the
decision once.
>
> +static struct soc_device_attribute exynos4210_rev11[] = {
> + { .soc_id = "EXYNOS4210", .revision = "11", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> static void __iomem *cpu_boot_reg_base(void)
> {
> - if (soc_is_exynos4210() && samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
> + if (soc_device_match(exynos4210_rev11))
> return pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM5;
> return sysram_base_addr;
> }
> @@ -182,9 +187,10 @@ static inline void __iomem *cpu_boot_reg(int cpu)
> boot_reg = cpu_boot_reg_base();
> if (!boot_reg)
> return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> - if (soc_is_exynos4412())
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412"))
> boot_reg += 4*cpu;
> - else if (soc_is_exynos5420() || soc_is_exynos5800())
> + else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5800"))
> boot_reg += 4;
> return boot_reg;
> }
Same here, it would be nicer to rework the code to compute the address
once while called from a place where you already know this information
and then store the register address.
>
> +static struct soc_device_attribute exynos4210_rev11[] = {
> + { .soc_id = "EXYNOS4210", .revision = "11", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct soc_device_attribute exynos4210_rev10[] = {
> + { .soc_id = "EXYNOS4210", .revision = "10", },
> + { },
> +};
Please use a single 'soc_device_attribute' table and make use
of the .data field to encode the difference.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
