On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:37 AM, pankaj.dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Saturday 05 November 2016 09:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:09:21AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >>> We can safely remove exynos_smp_init_cpus() hook from mach-exynos/platsmp.c, >>> as all SMP platforms in mach-exynos can rely on DT for CPU core description >>> instead of determining number of cores from the SCU. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 31 ------------------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-) >>> >> >> >> Thanks, applied. Somehow your patchset did not reach linux-samsung-soc's >> Parchwork. I don't have a clue why... It is on linux-arm-kernel's >> Patchwork. >> > > Thanks for looking into this series. > > I am also not sure why its not reflecting for you on linux-samsung-soc's > Patchwork, but I can see this series in linux-samsung-soc Patchwork at > below links: Hmmm... it is weird. Why I didn't see them before? It seems that I even updated their status. Confusing... > Will you please review other two patches (3/4 and 4/4) in this series? 4/4 is okay but it depends on 3/4 which already has a valid comment - what will happen when DT node is not present (which first of all will happen because DTS is applied on separate branch... and anyway the code must be prepared for different DTSes). Initially I thought there will be NULL pointer exception on of_iomap() but after looking at the code it might work, I mean fail in a reasonable way. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |