On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:28:10PM +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > +struct s3c24XX_nand_devtype_data {
> > + enum s3c_cpu_type type;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct s3c24XX_nand_devtype_data s3c2410_nand_devtype_data = {
> > + .type = TYPE_S3C2410,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct s3c24XX_nand_devtype_data s3c2412_nand_devtype_data = {
> > + .type = TYPE_S3C2412,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct s3c24XX_nand_devtype_data s3c2440_nand_devtype_data = {
> > + .type = TYPE_S3C2440,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct s3c24XX_nand_devtype_data s3c6400_nand_devtype_data = {
> > + .type = TYPE_S3C2412,
>
> All of these look like candidate for static const.
>
> Additionally you are not actually differentiating between s3c2412 and
> s3c64xx so I think there is not need of samsung,s3c6400-nand compatible.
> Just use existing one.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
You are right. I'll review and send V2.
Best regards,
Sergio Prado
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
