Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state after configuring the PSR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sean,

Thanks for your comments.

On 09/07/2016 03:51 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Make sure the request PSR state could effect in analogix_dp_send_psr_spd()
function, or printing the error Sink PSR state if we failed to effect
the request PSR setting.

Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c |  6 ++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h |  4 ++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++--
  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
index efac8ab..5a37de8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -115,8 +115,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev)
         psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
         psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;

-       analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
-       return 0;
+       return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);

@@ -138,8 +137,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev)
         psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
         psr_vsc.DB1 = 0;

-       analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
-       return 0;
+       return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
index 473b980..f617a9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void analogix_dp_config_video_slave_mode(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
  void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
  void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
  void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
-void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
-                             struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
+int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
+                            struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);

  #endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_CORE_H */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
index 52c1b6b..505e9d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
@@ -1328,9 +1328,11 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
         writel(PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
  }

-void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
-                             struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
+int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
+                            struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
  {
+       unsigned long timeout;
+       unsigned char sink;
u8
Done
         unsigned int val;

         /* don't send info frame */
@@ -1372,4 +1374,24 @@ void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
         val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
         val |= IF_EN;
         writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
+
+       timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
Pull 100 out into a #define
Done
+       while (1) {
+               analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
You should be checking return value here.
Done
+
+               if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB)
+                       break;
+
+               if (!vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
+                       break;
+
+               if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+                       dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
+                       return -EBUSY;
-ETIMEDOUT is more appropriate
Done
+               }
+
+               usleep_range(1000, 1500);
+       }
The while(1) loop is a little scary. I'd rather do:

while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
                ret = analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
                if (ret != 1) {
                        DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "PSR_STATUS read failed
ret=%d", ret);
                        return ret;
                }

                if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB ||
                    !vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
                        return 0;

                usleep_range(1000, 1500);
}

dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
return -ETIMEDOUT;

Thanks for your code.

- Yakir



+
+       return 0;
  }
--
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux