Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(),
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here.
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang<strongbox8@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc)
int eint_irq;
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
- chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data);
-
- if (chip->irq_ack)
- chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq);
generic_handle_irq(eint_irq);
- chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
+
chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
}
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
