Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. Signed-off-by: perr <strongbox8@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c @@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) int eint_irq; chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); - chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); - - if (chip->irq_ack) - chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); - chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data); + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); } -- 1.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |