Hi Krzysztof and Jacek, Thanks for the review. On 07/15/2016 03:37 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 07/15/2016 11:30 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07/15/2016 11:18 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> On 07/15/2016 10:33 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 07/15/2016 10:28 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>>>> On 07/15/2016 10:17 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 07/15/2016 10:14 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>>>>>>> However if these compatibles are exactly equal then >>>>>>>> only one should be preferred. It makes everything easier. Second >>>>>>>> can be >>>>>>>> still documented e.g. as deprecated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Still, both of them are present in the driver. Shouldn't it be >>>>>>> reflected >>>>>>> in the documentation? >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, it is a good practice, so how about: >>>>>> >>>>>> - compatible : should be one of: >>>>>> "samsung,s5pv210-jpeg", "samsung,exynos3250-jpeg", >>>>>> "samsung,exynos4210-jpeg", "samsung,exynos5420-jpeg", >>>>>> "samsung,exynos5433-jpeg"; >>>>>> >>>>>> Deprecated: "samsung,exynos4212-jpeg" >>>>>> >>>>>> (or any other formatting) >>>>>> plus update to DTS changing it to 4210? I am sending the v2 doc patch that adds samsung,exynos4212-jpeg as deprecated to begin with. thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |