On 07/09/2016 11:23 AM, Randy Li wrote:
> Those platforms are reported to use the same rtc IP core
> as exynos3250's.
Insufficient. Exynos4 also has to be updated. Actually all SoC from SoC
family requires rtc src clock. I think S3C6410 also requires it but I
don't have all the data necessary to confirm this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Li <ayaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 62f3dcd..cdd69a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
> };
>
> rtc: rtc@10070000 {
> - compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc";
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc";
> reg = <0x10070000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <0 73 0>, <0 74 0>;
> interrupt-parent = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> index d5c0f18..71a1ad2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
> };
>
> rtc: rtc@101E0000 {
> - compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc";
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc";
> reg = <0x101E0000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>;
> status = "disabled";
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
