Hi, 2016-05-17 16:26 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Although unbinding a driver requires root privileges but it still might > be used theoretically in certain attacks (by triggering NULL pointer > exception or memory corruption if driver does not provide proper remove > callbacks or core does not handle it). > > Samsung clock drivers are essential for system operation so their > removal is not expected. More over, the Exynos3250 ISP clock driver does > not implement remove() driver callback and it is not buildable as > modules. > > Suppress the unbind interface for Exynos3250 ISP and S3C2410 DCLK clock > drivers. > > Suggested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c | 1 + > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410-dclk.c | 5 +++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Makes sense. (By the way, I wonder if we ever see a solution for the unbind problem with .remove implemented and some resources that can't be released at the time .unbind is attempted...) Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |