On 06/10/2016 03:02 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: > On 10/06/16 12:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 06/10/2016 01:12 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: >>> On 08/06/16 19:31, Matthew Leach wrote: >>>> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> The exynos low-level debug macros need to be fixed if the system is being >>>> built big endian. Add the necessary endian swaps for accessing the registers >>>> to get output working again >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/include/debug/samsung.S | 8 ++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> Should this go via the maintainer or to RMK? >>> >>> If to RMK, then shall I get it submitted (and does anyone else >>> want to ack?) >> >> If there are no objections, I can take it through samsung-soc with other >> arch/arm/mach-exynos* patches. >> >> What I am missing here, is Matthew's Signed-off-by. >> >> Matthew, you touched and sent the patch so could you add the Sob? > > I've asked Matthew to re-send the core patches with the signed-off > sorted out. Thanks. > He can also put them on a public facing git server if > that would be helpful. No need. I think it will go through separate trees anyway. Except the change adding ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN, I don't see any dependencies. As for the ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN, I think it should be applied when all necessary drivers are fixed. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |