On 05/26/2016 11:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Although unbinding a pinctrl driver requires root privileges but it >> still might be used theoretically in certain attacks (by triggering NULL >> pointer exception or memory corruption). > > Patch applied with Javier's review tag. > > I suspect this kind of patch should be done to a few > GPIO controller :/ Probably yes... Either the driver properly and safely handles unbind (remove() callback) or it should be forbidden. In the same time, even if remove() is implemented, unbinding some of the core SoC drivers is like shooting self in the foot. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |