Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016, 11:12:20 schrieb Doug Anderson: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix_dp.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix_dp.txt > >> > >> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties for dp-controller: > >> platform specific such as: > >> * "samsung,exynos5-dp" > >> * "rockchip,rk3288-dp" > >> > >> + * "rockchip,rk3399-edp" > > > > the cleanlines-freak in my likes to know if there is a difference > > between > > the rk3399 being called -edp here and -dp on the rk3288 :-) > > > > [...] > > If I was a guessing man (which I'm not, but if I was), I'd guess that > this is because on rk3288 there was only one DP port and it was an EDP > port. ...but since there was only one people just referred to it as > the "DP" port and that was codified in the bindings. On rk3399 there > are two ports: one EDP and one DP. All of a sudden we need to > differentiate. > > Any better suggestions for how to deal with that? nope - everything as it should be in that regard then - the rk3288-dp is permanent now anyway. But it looks like I'm sort of blind blind and only now have seen the separate DP controller chapter in the TRM (probably because I somehow didn't expect a second controller). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |