On 04/13/2016 08:26 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> > @@ -205,7 +206,11 @@ static struct samsung_cmu_info topc_cmu_info __initdata = {
>> >
>> > static void __init exynos7_clk_topc_init(struct device_node *np)
>> > {
>> > + struct clk *clk;
>> > +
>> > samsung_cmu_register_one(np, &topc_cmu_info);
>> > + clk = __clk_lookup("aclk_ccore_133");
>> > + clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>
> Shouldn't this be rather done before calling
> samsung_cmu_register_one()? I don't remember exactly, but wouldn't
> clock registration trigger reading back current (mux, div) values from
> registers?
>
> Also, do we have any guarantees on order of initialization of
> particular CMUs? I believe this will happen in order of DT nodes and
> so would be not any kind of guarantee at all.
If these clocks need to be kept enabled perhaps it's better to just set
CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for them? Patches adding this flag are already in
clk-next branch in the clk git tree. This way the clocks would get
enabled within the clk_register() call.
The CMU registration order is enforced by listing input clocks to each
CMU in DT. However, I wouldn't be concerned much about it in context
of this patch. We are enabling here clocks which belong to same CMU.
samsung_cmu_register_one() needs to be called first for subsequent
__clk_lookup() calls to work.
Perhaps related bits need to be set manually in CMU registers before
registering a clock provider for the CMU, to fulfil the requirements.
Anyway, summary of the $subject patch seems not precise enough:
"This patch enables clocks for CMU_CCORE and CMU_FSYS0 blocks. This is
required before accessing registers of these blocks."
We need to enable selected clocks (i.e. access the CMU's registers)
before accessing this CMU's registers?
--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
