On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
> (the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
> lookup table) and real PWM state.
>
> Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
> config and not the current state.
>
> This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
> hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
> just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> index 3e23003..82c5656 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> @@ -40,15 +40,18 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
>
> static int __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm)
> {
> + struct pwm_args pargs = { };
Hi Boris,
I guess I am missing some context; sorry for that. Unfortunately,
I did not easily find an explanation, so please bear with me.
Two questions: Why do we need a local copy of struct pwm_args instead
of a pointer to it ? If it can change while being used, isn't it
inconsistent anyway ?
Also, assuming the local copy is necessary, why initialize pargs ?
After all, pwm_get_args() just overwrites it.
Thanks,
Guenter
> unsigned long duty;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
> +
> mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
> if (ctx->pwm_value == pwm)
> goto exit_set_pwm_err;
>
> - duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> - ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
> + duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (pargs.period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> + ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pargs.period);
> if (ret)
> goto exit_set_pwm_err;
>
> @@ -214,6 +217,7 @@ static int pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data(struct device *dev,
> static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> + struct pwm_args pargs = { };
> struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx;
> struct device *hwmon;
> int duty_cycle;
> @@ -234,10 +238,11 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);
>
> /* Set duty cycle to maximum allowed */
> - duty_cycle = ctx->pwm->period - 1;
> + pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
> + duty_cycle = pargs.period - 1;
> ctx->pwm_value = MAX_PWM;
>
> - ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, ctx->pwm->period);
> + ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, pargs.period);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
> return ret;
> @@ -303,14 +308,16 @@ static int pwm_fan_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct pwm_args pargs = { };
> unsigned long duty;
> int ret;
>
> if (ctx->pwm_value == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> - ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
> + pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
> + duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (pargs.period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> + ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pargs.period);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
