On 14/03/2016 at 18:07:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > Hello Joe, > > On 03/14/2016 05:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:25 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> The clock and source clock looked up by the driver may not be available > >> just because the clock controller driver was not probed yet so printing > >> an error in this case is not correct and only adds confusion to users. > >> > >> However, knowing that a driver's probe was deferred may be useful so it > >> can be printed as debug information. > > > > Hello again Javier: > >> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe deferred due missing rtc clk\n"); > > > > Again, intelligible English would not use "due" > > but would use "due to" or "because of". > > > > Ok, I'll post another version then. I hope the third time's the charm... > > Alexandre, do you have any other comments before I re-spin this patch? > No further comments :) -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |