On 23.02.2016 03:26, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-02-17 02:03:36) >> On 16/02/16 07:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS >>> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit. >>> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like >>> multi_v7 for ARMv7). >>> >>> Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Thanks for the Ack. > > I've rebased patches #1 and #2 against James's b9e65ebc654d and pushed > the clk-samsung branch to the clk tree. I have deleted the > clk-samsung-kconfig branch that was blowing up the kbuild robot. > clk-samsung will not be rebased and can be used as a dependency for > arm-soc. It has been merged into clk-next. Thanks, pulled! Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |