W dniu 31.01.2016 o 21:05, Alexandre Belloni pisze: > Hi, > > On 27/01/2016 at 00:36:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : >> Hello, >> >> On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan, >> we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost >> the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate >> drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802. >> >> By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs >> could be supported as well like the max77620. >> >> This is a v4 of a series that do this, that address issues pointed out >> in the latest version. The v1, v2 and v3 can be found at [1], [2], [3]. >> >> I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has >> a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly. Krzysztof Kozlowski >> tested v3 on an max77686 but this version only has cosmetic changes so >> it should not cause any functionality changes. >> >> [0]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg110348.html >> [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/672568/ >> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/25/767 >> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/26/787 >> > > I've applied patches 1 to 8 and I'll discussed with Arnd and Olof about > what I should do with the defconfig changes. To avoid conflicts they could go through samsung-soc tree. I could pick them if you provide me a tag with rest of patchset (dependencies). Would that be okay for you? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |