> > On 01/26/2016 10:22 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> >> Hi Javier,
> >>
> >>> if (tm->tm_year < 100) {
> >>> - pr_warn("RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000.\n",
> >>> - 1900 + tm->tm_year);
> >>> + dev_warn(info->dev,
> >>> + "RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000\n",
> >>> + 1900 + tm->tm_year);
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> Because we are returning an error value, why not use dev_err()?
> >>
> >
> > You are absolutely right. Since the driver was using pr_warn(), I used
> > dev_warn() but dev_err() would had been correct.
>
> Wait. The message says that "2000 will be assumed" which is not an
> error. The message indicates that driver will proceed, thus the warning.
>
> However the driver won't proceed because the max77686_rtc_set_time()
> will abort. This came from max8997 which has the same issue.
>
> This means that either message should be changed (dev_err() without the
> "assume" verb) or the function should not abort and set the year to
> 2000+something (then dev_warn()... look at rtc-ds3234.c and rtc-mcp795.c).
>
> The easiest would be to choose #1 - no changes in the logic.
Nevertheless, the function fails, and those who call
max77686_rtc_tm_to_data() fail as well, so, we are printing
warning, but behaving as error.
Either we print error and return error, or we print warning, we
set:
tm->tm_year = 100; /* don't know if I got the logic right */
and return 0
Right?
Thanks,
Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
