On 11.12.2015 13:07, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 22 November 2015 at 05:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2015-11-22 3:14 GMT+09:00 Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
[...]
>> Yes, now you pasted the same warning I did...
>>
>> This is still the same issue. I already wrote it:
>>> 1. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
>>> 2. DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(in_interrupt())
>>
>> We can repeat it many times but that won't change anything...
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Would you consider below changes to fix the above issue.
> I have tested this change by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
> And I don't observed issue.
>
> 1. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
> 2. DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(in_interrupt())
>
> Please share your thought on this changes.
>
> root@odroidxu4:/usr/src/odroidxu3-4.y-devel# git diff drivers/pwm/core.c
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> index d24ca5f..f3f6cf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> @@ -506,6 +506,9 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
> if (!pwm)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (!mutex_is_locked(&pwm->lock))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> mutex_lock(&pwm->lock);
>
> if (!test_and_set_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) {
First of all, Thierry suggested way of fixing this:
"Any objections to simply removing it and make all users use a workqueue
or some such if they need to control a PWM as a result of an interrupt
trigger?"
what is wrong with his approach?
Second, you are writing something that looks like mutex-try-lock...
which will fail the pwm_enable(). IMHO this *hides* the real issue and
does not solve anything (except hiding also the warning).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
