Hi, On Tuesday, December 08, 2015 05:13:26 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08.12.2015 03:18, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > From: Ben Gamari <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The Exynos 5422 is identical to the 5800 except for the fact that it > > boots from the A7 cores. Consequently, the core numbering is different: > > cores 0-3 are A7s whereas 4-7 are A15s. > > > > We can reuse the device tree of the 5800 for the 5422 but we must take > > care to override the OPP tables and CPU clocks. These are otherwise > > inherited from the exynos5800 devicetree, which has the CPU clusters > > reversed compared to the 5422. This results in the A15 cores only > > reaching 1.4GHz, the maximum rate of the KFC clock. > > > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Gamari <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > This looks like a very-non-atomic way of handling a change. You added > opp tables to exynos5420 before so at that time they will be applied to > Odroid XU3 family which uses different CPU order. After that you are > fixing the tables to proper CPU order. Direct bisectability probably > won't be an issue because all of DTS would go to separate branch... but > the logic behind confuses. It was done this way to preserve original authorship of changes and bisectability should not be affected unless patch #8 is merged before patch #7. > I think this should be squashed into 3/8. OK. > Best regards, > Krzysztof Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |