On 08.12.2015 10:33, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 12/07/2015 09:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07.12.2015 21:52, Inki Dae wrote: >>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The DT binding for the Exynos DRM Display Port (DP) driver isn't consistent >>> since it uses a phandle to describe the connection between the DP port and >>> the display panel but uses the OF graph ports and endpoints to describe the >>> connection betwen the DP port, a bridge chip and the panel. >>> >>> The Exynos DP driver and the DT binding have been changed to allow also to >>> describe the DP port to panel connection using ports / endpoints (OF graph) >>> so this patch changes the Exynos5800 Peach Pi DT to make it consistent with >>> the Exynos5420 Peach Pit that has a eDP to LVDS chip and uses OF graph too. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 15 ++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >> >> Looks sensible: >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Dependencies are not mentioned, does it depend on patch 1? >> > > Yes, it depends on patch 1/4 so it should be merged through the Exynos DRM > tree to maintain bisectability. Inki's patch maintains the DT ABI backward > compatibility though so another option is to wait until the DRM change hit > mainline and then pick $SUBJECT. Thanks. We could also use a tag with DRM changes for samsung-soc but since I already flushed my queue for v4.5 I think it would be an overkill. From my point of view it can safely go through exynos-drm tree. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |