Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 03-12-15, 11:26, Ben Gamari wrote: >> Sounds reasonable to me. However, I'd just like to reiterate that this >> line of work can be pursued independently from the upstreaming of this >> series. > > I think this is the right time to upstream the right solution. Just > try it once, if you face lots of difficulties or issues, then we can > ofcourse see.. > It looks like Bartlomiej has picked up this set. Regardless, while tracking down various devicetree issues I noticed that the cpu-supply and cpu%d-supply bindings appear to be completely undocumented. It seem as though this ought to be fixed. Cheers, - Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
