On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> >> it up (at least for the time being).
> >
> > Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
>
> Sure.
>
> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
> (as in attachment).
>
I don't think so:
static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
.name = "s3c2442_plls169344",
.subsys = &s3c2442_subsys,
.add_dev = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
};
This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
have a broken list.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
