Hello! > You missed here a lot of potential Cc. Please use get_maintainer.pl > script. It *must* be sent to devicetree list. > > Please send it also to DeviceTree maintainers because you are adding > quite generic names for bindings so they may have interesting thoughts > on this. > > LKML list is also missing. Ok. Next version will go there too. > Any vendor prefix here? How generic is this? I just don't know... Does *everything* really need a vendor prefix? How readable would that be? "compatible" property already says that it's samsung-exynos-specific. And IMHO it's quite obvious that properties of vendor-specific device are automatically vendor-specific. Ok, i am currently fixing up the rest and will post v4 soon, and will Cc: it to devicetree ML. P.S. I intentionally omit the rest of the text in order to avoid overquoting, since we are already focused on some specific things. If someone wants to get the whole picture, he/she could just browse back to the start of the thread. Or is it considered wrong approach in this particular ML? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |