Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Note that personally I would only choose the "highest" priority as an
>> absolute last resort. Leaving a little extra slack in there means
>> that when the next person comes up with a really good reason to run
>> before you do that they can do it without changing your code. All
>> good BASIC programmers know to skip "10" in their first version for
>> just this reason. ;)
>>
>> If I were to pick a number, I suppose I'd pick something like "220",
>> but that's pretty arbitrary. I would have picked 200 except that it
>> appears that would race with veyron's choice.
>>
>
> Yes, I actually gave some thought about choosing a number since I didn't
> want to come with another arbitrary one. That's why I tried to understand
> the policy as I mentioned before but I didn't find anything besides the
> values listed in the register_restart_handler() doc: 0, 128 and 255.
>
> It seems that most default system restart handlers use 128 and that's
> the reason why gpio-restart and mmc-pwrseq-emmc use 129 and other restart
> handlers that can be registered via DT use 192 (which is in the middle of
> 128 and 255).
>
> So I actually thought to use a number in between 192 and 255 (i.e: 220)
> but then there could be another platform that uses 221 instead of 200
> so eMMC restart won't work there. That's why I finally chose the highest.
>
> Do you know why the priority 200 was chosen for veyron gpi-restart ooi?
In David Riley's original patch the example had 200:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4784611/
In the ChromeOS 3.14 kernel tree I believe we're still using the old
patch (we still have /bits/ 8). ...it looks like I'm the one who
originally added it to the veyron dts file and I set it to 200, so I'd
presume that I just copied the example and called it "good enough".
I'm sure the upstream dts just used the number from the ChromeOS 3.14 tree...
Note that the GPIO-restart definitely need to be higher priorities
than others in the system. The two I know of off the top of my head
are the "dw watchdog" and the one in the CRU. The "dw watchdog" has a
priority of 128 and so does the one in "rockchip/clk.c". Hrm,
actually, the Rockchip-specific one should probably have its priority
bumped up since it seems better not to just randomly pick between
these two...
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
