2015-10-17 18:55 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 10/17/2015 10:53 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-10-17 8:41 GMT+09:00 Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>
>>> So...how can I take 2nd patch of this series in samsung(arm-soc) tree?
>>> And this series shouldn't be for fixes for 4.3?...Mike how do you think?
>>
>> Stephen acked it so I thought everything will go through samsung-soc.
>>
>> Dear Kukjin,
>> Indeed this can go as fix for current cycle... but in the same time
>> this does not fix any specific regression. Tomeu did not describe when
>> issue happened for the first time so I assumed it was like that
>> always. It's up to you.
>>
>
> Sorry for not answering about this series before but I've been in contact
> with Tomeu over IRC before he posted it and since you already added your
> Reviewed-by tag, I didn't feel the need do to it.
>
> This is a regression for 4.3 since S2R was working correctly for 4.2 in
> Snow, I tested after fixing resume with commit 6fd4899a54a5 ("irqchip:
> exynos-combiner: Save IRQ enable set on suspend") and the display was
> always enabled on resume.
Hmmm, that means the patchset indeed should go as fixes.
Thanks for details,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
