Hello Kishon, On 10/06/2015 04:29 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Tuesday 06 October 2015 07:39 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: [snip] >> >> This was a pure resend, no changes to the patch has been made. I just >> noticed >> that it is over 6 weeks since the initial submission and the patch is still >> not in linux-next... > > It won't be in linux-next. I've just merged this patch to linux-phy > -next and will be sent during the next merge window. Only fixes will be > merged during the -rc releases. > When patches are pushed to mainline it's somehow orthogonal to what is exposed in -next. Only fixes for regressions will be pushed during the -rc cycle and new features will be pushed during the next merge window of course but that should not prevent accepted patches to get some test coverage under -next. In fact, ideally patches should sit in -next for a couple of weeks before are pushed to mainline since there is a lot of automated (0day, kernelci, etc) and manual testing that happen on that tree to detect issues earlier. I noticed that linux-phy isn't shown in [0] though, probably should be added? > Thanks > Kishon > -- [0]: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Next/Trees?id=HEAD Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |