2015-10-01 23:12 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-10-01 20:39 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
>> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
>> > register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
>>
>> How the value is overwritten if the soc is Exynos5260? I can't see it
>> (although the "else if" is still more obvious than "if" but how does
>> the description match the code?).
> The code here is:
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> else
> emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON;
>
> So if data->soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260 , then emul_con becomes
> EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON. But again for the else part it will become
> EXYNOS_EMUL_CON.
Indeed!
Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU")
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
