On 09/28/15 21:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > W dniu 28.09.2015 o 20:54, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz pisze: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Monday, September 28, 2015 05:52:13 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> W dniu 21.09.2015 o 18:59, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz pisze: >>>> Hi Hans, >>>> >>>> W dniu 21.09.2015 o 11:50, Hans Verkuil pisze: >>>>> On 18-09-15 16:21, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: >>>>>> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Add Exynos 5433 jpeg h/w codec node. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi >>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi >>>>> >>>>> This dtsi file doesn't exist in the media-git tree. What is the story >>>>> here? >>>>> >>>>> Should this go through a different subsystem? >>>>> >>>>> I think the media subsystem can take patches 1-3 and whoever does DT >>>>> patches can >>>>> take this patch, right? >>>> >>>> The cover letter explains that the series is rebased onto Mauro's >>>> master with Kukjin's branch merged. The latter does contain >>>> the exynos5433.dtsi. That said, yes, taking patches 1-3 in >>>> media subsystem and leaving DT patch to someone else is the >>>> way to go. >>> >>> Although Kukjin picked Exynos 5433 ARM64 patches but they were not >>> accepted upstream by arm-soc. He rolled it for few releases but: >>> 1. Reason for not accepting by arm-soc was not resolved - there is no DTS. >>> 2. Kukjin did not rebase the branch for 4.4... which maybe means that he >>> wants to drop it? >>> 3. Anyone (but me...) can send Galaxy Note4 (Exynos5433) DTS file based >>> on sources on opensource.samsung.com. The DTS there is for 32-bit but it >>> can be probably easily adjusted for ARM64. >>> >>> All of this means that Device Tree support for this driver can't be >>> merged now and effort for mainlining 5433 may be unfortunately wasted... >> >> Exynos5433 support is being incrementally merged (clocks, drm, phy, >> pinctrl, thermal and tty support is already in upstream or -next). >> >> I don't know why DTS changes got stuck in Kukjin's tree (Kukjin, >> could you please explain?) but I think that this shouldn't not stop >> us from continuing Exynos5433 upstreaming effort. > > I already explained. There is no DTS, so the pull request was rejected > (pull request for v4.0 I believe). > + Chanwoo Choi Yes right, as Krzysztof commented, the pull-request has been rejected by arm-soc even I explained it has been tested on smdk5433, because it will not be compiled without relevant board DT file. And I've rebased when new -rc1 released until 4.3...because Chanwoo said at that time that regarding DT file will be submitted but not yet... To be honest, I'm not sure I can keep the exynos5433 changes for v4.4 in my tree at this moment... > It was not about adding drivers for 5433's clocks/phy/pinctrl etc. It > was about DTS. Could be...hmm... Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |