Hi Krzysztof,
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 05:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 29.04.2015 o 17:38, Pankaj Dubey pisze:
As now we have dedicated driver for SROM controller, it will take care
of saving register banks during S2R so we can safely remove these
settings from mach-exynos.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 2 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 10 -----
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 --
arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 20 +---------
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 1 -
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-srom.h | 54 --------------------------
6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-srom.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index 603820e..e842b23 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ menuconfig ARCH_EXYNOS
select S5P_DEV_MFC
select SRAM
select MFD_SYSCON
+ select SOC_SAMSUNG
+ select EXYNOS_SROM
What about the difference of execution time? The suspend/resume of
device may not be called in the same time as previous syscore ops. Does
this have any impact?
I had tested it for S2R at that time on SMDK5250 board and it was fine.
I do not noticed any issue in S2R, so I feel timing should not have any
impact.
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html