Re: drm/exynos: g2d userptr memory corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adding Jérôme to Cc. I think he looked the userptr code before, so maybe
he has some idea what is going wrong here.

I also had a look at the code, but my knowledge about the DMA API is
almost nonexistant. However I can see that before doing any DMA via the
G2D on the buffer the code calls dma_map() on it, and also unmaps it
when the commandlist is finished.


With best wishes,
Tobias


Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Thanks Lucas for the explanation!
> 
> 
> Lucas Stach wrote:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2015, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Tobias Jakobi:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> some time ago I checked whether I could use the userptr functionality to
>>> do zero-copy from userspace allocated buffers via the G2D. This didn't
>>> work out so well, so kinda put this to the bottom of my TODO list.
>>>
>>> Now that IOMMU support has landed and Jan Kara has rewrote page pinning
>>> using frame vectors (see [1]) I gave userptr another try.
>>>
>>> The results are much better. I'm not experiencing any kernel lockups or
>>> sysmmu pagefaults anymore. However the image now suffers from visual
>>> artifacts. These images show the nature of the artifacts:
>>> http://i.imgur.com/nzT6g3Y.jpg
>>> http://i.imgur.com/wkuYI6X.jpg
>>>
>>> The corruption always manifests itself in these pixel lines of fixed
>>> size and wrong color.
>>>
>>> I have written a testcase as part of libdrm for this issue:
>>> https://github.com/tobiasjakobi/libdrm/commit/db8bf6844436598251f67a71fc334b929bfb2b71
>>>
>>> It allocates N (N an even number) buffers which are aligned to the
>>> system pagesize. Then it does this each iteration:
>>> 1) Fill the first N/2 buffers with random data
>>> 2) Copy the first half to the second half of the buffers
>>> 3) memcmp() first and second half (verification pass)
>>>
>>> Usually this verification already fails on the first iteration. An
>>> interesting observation is that increasing (!) the buffer size (so the
>>> amount of pixels that have to copied per buffer grows) makes this issue
>>> less likely to happen.
>>>
>>> With the default 512x512 buffers however it happens, like I said above,
>>> almost immediately.
>>>
>> This is obviously a cache flush missing. The memory you get from
>> userspace is normal cached memory, so to make it visible to the GPU you
>> need to flush parts of the cache out to main memory.
>>
>> The corruption you are seeing is just unflushed cachelines. This also
>> explains why increasing the buffer size helps: the more memory the CPU
>> touches the more cachelines will be flushed out to be replaced with new
>> data.
> I should point out that the snapshots I uploaded were done with a
> different setup. There only the source memory of the G2D operation is a
> userspace allocated buffer. The destination is a GEM buffer allocated
> through libdrm, which is then used as framebuffer. So the issue already
> appears when just the source is userspace allocated.
> 
> What works however is an operation between GEM to GEM. However this
> might be related to the default allocation flags libdrm uses.
> 
> 
> 
>> So you need to go and have a look at dma_map() and dma_sync_*_for_*()
>> and friends.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lucas
>>
> 
> 
> With best wishes,
> Tobias
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux