Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/exynos: remove struct exynos_drm_encoder layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015년 08월 11일 09:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Inki,
> 
> 2015-08-07 Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> On 2015년 08월 06일 22:31, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> struct exynos_drm_encoder was justing wrapping struct drm_encoder, it had
>>> only a drm_encoder member and the internal exynos_drm_encoders ops that
>>> was directly mapped to the drm_encoder helper funcs.
>>>
>>> So now exynos DRM uses struct drm_encoder directly, this removes
>>> completely the struct exynos_drm_encoder.
>>>
>>
>> Trats2 board, which uses Exynos4412 Soc, doesn't work after this patch
>> is applied. Below is the booting logs,
>> [    1.171318] console [ttySAC2] enabled
>> [    1.175522] 13830000.serial: ttySAC3 at MMIO 0x13830000 (irq = 60,
>> base_baud = 0) is a S3C6400/10
>> [    1.185545] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
>> [    1.194104] exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 11c00000.fimd (ops
>> fimd_component_ops)
>> [    1.200352] exynos-drm exynos-drm: bound 11c80000.dsi (ops
>> exynos_dsi_component_ops)
>> [    1.207688] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).
>> [    1.214313] [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query.
>> [    1.220218] [drm] Initialized exynos 1.0.0 20110530 on minor 0
>>
>> Booting is locked up here. This patch looks good to me so I tried to
>> find why locked up and I found the booting is locked up as soon as
>> console_lock function is called. Can you and other guys look into this
>> issue?
> 
> I've realized that I left a fix for patch 01 behind, it could be the
> cause of this issue. I've just resent this patch with the added v2 fix
> up.

With above change, still locked up. So your updated patch doesn't
resolve this issue.

Anyway, I tested it with fbdev emulation relevant patch series[1] and
the booting was ok with disabling fbdev emulation as Daniel commented.
However, I think the booting should also be ok with fbdev emulation so I
don't want for your last patch to be merged to mainline until the issue
is resolved.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg86617.html
    http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-March/078975.html

Thanks,
Inki Dae

> 
> 	Gustavo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux