On 07.08.2015 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Fixed Olof's email id.. > > On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related >> stuff or use get_maintainers .. >> >> Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff.. >> >> On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> Depends on: >>>> - next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel tree >>>> - "[PATCH V3 00/16] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings" >>>> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg435408.html) >>>> >>> BTW, hmm...how can we see this series in v4.3?...to be honest, I don't think it >>> can be done in v4.3 because of dependencies with PM / OPP series >> >> That is merged by Rafael Yesterday. That is manageable Indeed, happy to hear it! So the patchset has no external dependencies. >> >>> and previous >>> exynos CPU OPP series in each cross trees...maybe that's why you created based >>> on linux-next...any idea? >> >> So there is no build dependency with OPP patches I hope, as its all >> about using the bindings defined by them. And so you don't need to >> depend on that. >> >> You might have to rebase on the ARM tree to manage your conflicts. In >> this case you can rebase directly on ARM SoC branch which has your >> patches (rebase directly over the last patch instead of the whole >> branch) and make sure Olof knows about this and he doesn't update >> (i.e. rebase) his branch, which he might not anyway. >> >> The whole idea is to keep a single sha-id for a commit. So you can >> rebase over the published material present in ARM-SoC .. Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it was put at the beginning of the patchset. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |