On 03-08-15, 12:36, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > I would really like it to be dependency not an option (+ I think > that ideally it should be checked at runtime, IOW we should be > checking from cpufreq-dt driver if the thermal support is enabled > before enabling boost support). I don't think boost has any dependency on thermal support. Yeah, it may be true for your platform but we can't force it. People might have different algorithms to control boost modes, thermal is just one option they may look at. For few, enabling boost may not be a thermal issue, but power. So, they want to allow it only when they want, but that wouldn't burn their chip. So, a platform can choose how it wants to have it. :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |