Hi Javier, On 07/13/2015 03:58 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The exynos-ppmu driver is only a clock consumer and not a clock provider > but its Device Tree binding listed #clock-cells as an optional property. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt > index b54bf3a2ff57..aed486692880 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ Required properties: > Optional properties: > - clock-names : the name of clock used by the PPMU, "ppmu" > - clocks : phandles for clock specified in "clock-names" property > -- #clock-cells: should be 1. > > Example1 : PPMU nodes in exynos3250.dtsi are listed below. > > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> + Devfreq maintainer (Myungjoo Ham) I think that this patch will be more appropriate on devfreq git tree than linux-samsung git tree. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |