2015-07-17 15:59 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 07/17/2015 08:49 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> 2015-07-17 15:46 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Hello Krzysztof, >>> >>> On 07/17/2015 08:42 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> 2015-07-17 15:29 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> The Maxim MAX77686 PMIC is a multi-function device with regulators, >>>>> clocks and a RTC. The DT bindings for the clocks are in a separate >>>>> file but the bindings for the regulators are inside the mfd part. >>>>> >>>>> To make it consistent with the clocks portion of the binding and >>>>> because is more natural to look for regulator bindings under the >>>>> bindings/regulator sub-directory, split the regulator portion of >>>>> the DT binding and add it as a separate file. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - Use a generic name for the max77686 node in the regulator example. >>>>> >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 58 +----------------- >>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/max77686.txt | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/max77686.txt >>>> >>>> Putting regulator bindings under regulator directory seems logical so >>>> I am fine with it. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>> >>> Thanks a lot for your review. For completeness, I talked with Lee Jones >>> over IRC yesterday asking him his opinion on whether MFD DT binding doc >>> should contain all the info or if it should be split across different >>> subsystems and he prefers the later. That's why I re-spun this series. >> >> Okay, this sounds good. >> >> One more thing - can you update the maintainers file? The bindings >> documentation is mentioned there for max77686. >> > > Sure, I see that also the max77802 files are missing in that section. > I'll included that as well. The max717802 are not there because they are not part of this maintainership :) . I wasn't involved in development of them (except reviewing) so I did not put myself as their maintainer. > But I'll wait to see if Lee pick this > series before posting the patch for MAINTAINERS. I think the maintainers should be updated in the same patchset (or even patch) to keep the state consistent. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |