The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat
generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise
programming model."
So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic
node name instead of using the chip's name.
Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2: None
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
index 8221102d3fc2..d2ed3c20a5c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow:
Example:
- max77686@09 {
+ max77686: pmic@09 {
compatible = "maxim,max77686";
interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>;
interrupts = <26 0>;
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
