On 07/13/2015 11:04 AM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> On 07/12/2015 06:06 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>>> Hello Andrzej!
>>>
>>> Just some small comments.
>>>
>>> It seems like linux-samsung-soc wasn't put into Cc for '[PATCH RESEND
>>> 0/6] drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes' (even though this series was),
>>> maybe you should also forward the other series to this list.
>> Yes, I forgot about it.
>>
>>> This series doesn't apply cleanly when 'drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes'
>>> is applied. E.g. the 'powered' boolean was removed by that series, but
>>> here in patch 2/7 ('drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling') it's
>>> still there.
>> 'drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes' removes powered field from
>> mixer driver, and powered field in the patch 2/7 is from hdmi driver.
>> So they should not interfere and for sure they do not interfere in my local git :)
>> Have you any warning when you tried to apply those patches.
> yes of course, otherwise I wouldn't point this out. The specific hunks
> just fail.
>
> Which is kinda obvious:
>> @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ struct hdmi_context {
>> struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> struct drm_connector connector;
>> struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>> - bool hpd;
>> bool powered;
>> bool dvi_mode;
>> struct mutex hdmi_mutex;
> This doesn't apply when 'powered' is no longer ther.
I have this field still present in my tree which is build of following components:
- current exynos-drm-next,
- drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes,
- this patchset
Could you show me exactly which patch removes this field?
As I mentioned one patch removes similar field from mixer driver, but not from hdmi.
Regards
Andrzej
>
>
>
> With best wishes,
> Tobias
>
>>> I also noticed that some of the patches ('drm/exynos/hdmi: remove
>>> private lock code') clash with Gustavo's latest cleanup series [1]. E.g.
>>> your patch 3/7 ('drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code') touches
>>> hdmi_commit() which was removed by Gustavo. Maybe you should coordinate
>>> things with him?
>> This is always problematic :) I can try to rebase my patches on Gustavo's
>> if necessary. Gustavo, Inki what is your opinion?
>>
>> Regards
>> Andrzej
>>
>>>
>>> With best wishes,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg45787.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>> Hi Inki, Joonyoung,
>>>>
>>>> These patches removes obsolete and old structures, to simplify further
>>>> development. They should not change behavior of the driver.
>>>>
>>>> The patchset is based on exynos-drm-next plus my HDMI related fixes [1].
>>>>
>>>> The patchset was tested on Universal and Odroid U3.
>>>>
>>>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/132348
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Andrzej
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrzej Hajda (7):
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove old platform data code
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: add driver data pointer to private context
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove redundant configuration fields
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v13_conf struct
>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v14_conf struct
>>>>
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 860 ++++++++++-------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 245 insertions(+), 615 deletions(-)
>>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
