Hi, On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 09:22:06 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30.06.2015 02:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic > > cpufreq driver for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos > > specific cpufreq support for these platforms can be removed. > > > > Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. > > > > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 -- > > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 - > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h | 17 --- > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c | 210 ----------------------------------- > > 5 files changed, 242 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c > > Nice diff stat, I like it! > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Few thoughts: > 1. Javier's email has changed, CC-ed the correct one. Can you update it > in all patches (CC-tags)? Done in v3. > 2. It looks like the patchset should go through one tree so the > Exynos5250 cpufreq support won't disappear, right? Right, this would be an ideal situation. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |