Hi, On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 08:46:33 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23.06.2015 00:04, Michael Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2015-06-21 18:46:26) > >> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> > >>> On 22.06.2015 10:38, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> 2015-05-08 9:18 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>>>>> 2015-04-04 1:43 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>>>>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For Exynos4210 platforms, add CPU operating points and CPU > >>>>>>> regulator supply properties for migrating from Exynos specific > >>>>>>> cpufreq driver to using generic cpufreq driver. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Changes by Bartlomiej: > >>>>>>> - removed Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 support for now > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Farber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> Rebased and applied to my tree, I'll sent it later to Kukjin unless he > >>>>> picks it by himself from LKML. > >>>>> > >>>> Hi, as far as I know, this is for v4.2 not v4.1 so it will be applied based on > >>>> v4.2-rc1 after v4.2-rc1 release. > >>> > >>> You mean it is for v4.3, not v4.2? > >>> > >> Oops, yes v4.3. > >> > >> Thanks for the correction. > > > > Kukjin & Krzysztof, > > > > I'm confused on this point. I was planning to take patches 1, 2, 3, 5 > > and 6 towards 4.2 (e.g. in the pull request that I'll send out this > > week). > > > > Is patch 4 going out for 4.2 or 4.3? > > It is quite late for sending pull request to arm-soc for 4.2. > For example SoCFPGA pull request from last week was rejected: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/417980 > > If you want to take it for 4.2 then I am fine with it but this will > cause some easy but annoying conflicts. There aren't difficult - just > most of nodes in board DTS changed their place. Taking all patches together would be a preferred solution from my POV. It would also be great if it could happen in v4.2 (all code changes are practically limited to our Exynos4210 platform so I hope that it should be fine) as it would be easier to work on Exynos4x12, Exynos5250 and Exynos542x/5800 patch series. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics > Example of resolution (target file after merge, with cpu nodes reordered > alphabetically): > https://github.com/krzk/linux/commit/2cec3cb48abaf44848c62f1c0836b772eb4680dd > > Best regards, > Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |