On 23.06.2015 08:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23.06.2015 00:04, Michael Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2015-06-21 18:46:26) >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> >>>> On 22.06.2015 10:38, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> 2015-05-08 9:18 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>> 2015-04-04 1:43 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For Exynos4210 platforms, add CPU operating points and CPU >>>>>>>> regulator supply properties for migrating from Exynos specific >>>>>>>> cpufreq driver to using generic cpufreq driver. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Changes by Bartlomiej: >>>>>>>> - removed Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 support for now >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Farber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rebased and applied to my tree, I'll sent it later to Kukjin unless he >>>>>> picks it by himself from LKML. >>>>>> >>>>> Hi, as far as I know, this is for v4.2 not v4.1 so it will be applied based on >>>>> v4.2-rc1 after v4.2-rc1 release. >>>> >>>> You mean it is for v4.3, not v4.2? >>>> >>> Oops, yes v4.3. >>> >>> Thanks for the correction. >> >> Kukjin & Krzysztof, >> >> I'm confused on this point. I was planning to take patches 1, 2, 3, 5 >> and 6 towards 4.2 (e.g. in the pull request that I'll send out this >> week). >> >> Is patch 4 going out for 4.2 or 4.3? > > It is quite late for sending pull request to arm-soc for 4.2. > For example SoCFPGA pull request from last week was rejected: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/417980 Oh, that was wrong link. Here it is: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg425911.html > If you want to take it for 4.2 then I am fine with it but this will > cause some easy but annoying conflicts. There aren't difficult - just > most of nodes in board DTS changed their place. > > Example of resolution (target file after merge, with cpu nodes reordered > alphabetically): > https://github.com/krzk/linux/commit/2cec3cb48abaf44848c62f1c0836b772eb4680dd Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
 |