On 2015년 06월 22일 20:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> + Krzysztof >> >> On 2015년 06월 22일 18:10, Inki Dae wrote: >>> On 2015년 06월 12일 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote: >>>> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source >>>> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement. >>> >>> Mr. Kukjin and Krzysztof, can you give me Acked-by or Singed-off-by? I'd >>> like to merge this patch to mainline through drm-next. > > Dear Hyungwon Hwang, > > Please always CC samsung-soc mailing list on such patches. I won't > receive it on my personal email if you don't CC the list. The > get_maintainers.pl gives necessary addresses. > > Comment below, > >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Inki Dae >>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Changes before: >>>> - Refer https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6191811 >>>> Changes for v6: >>>> - None >>>> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi >>>> index e20cdc2..1538d7a 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi >>>> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ >>>> phys = <&mipi_phy 1>; >>>> phy-names = "dsim"; >>>> clocks = <&clock CLK_DSIM0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_MIPI0>; >>>> - clock-names = "bus_clk", "pll_clk"; >>>> + clock-names = "bus_clk", "sclk_mipi"; > > It seems wrong. The driver fetches reference from a name of "pll_clk", > not "sclk_mipi". Also bindings documentation mentions pll_clk and > bus_clk only. Krzysztof, There is your missing point. The driver is already considered for pll_clk also. See the below codes, #define OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME "pll_clk" ... for (i = 0; i < dsi->driver_data->num_clks; i++) { dsi->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(dev, clk_names[i]); if (IS_ERR(dsi->clks[i])) { if (strcmp(clk_names[i], "sclk_mipi") == 0) { strcpy(clk_names[i], OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME); i--; continue; } dev_info(dev, "failed to get the clock: %s\n", clk_names[i]); return PTR_ERR(dsi->clks[i]); } } Above codes make the driver to try to get the pll_clk - defined as OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME macro - again if getting sclk_mipi clock failed so there is no problem even though a little bit ugly. As you know, we should guarantee the backward compatibility so this codes check two clock names. Thanks, Inki Dae > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > >>>> status = "disabled"; >>>> #address-cells = <1>; >>>> #size-cells = <0>; >>>> -- >>>> 1.9.1 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>> >>> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
 |