On Thursday, June 18, 2015 07:53:14 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > Mike, could you please take a look at patches #1 and #2 (#1 is a 4 line > change to a Common Clock Framework and #2 is ARM Exynos specific)? Oh, and patch #3 (which is also ARM Exynos specific). Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics > This series has been waiting on your feedback since 3rd of April. :( > > Best regards, > -- > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > On Thursday, June 04, 2015 08:22:05 AM Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 05/14/15 22:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > On 05/14/15 14:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > >> On 14-05-15, 13:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > >>> On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>> Hi Bart, > > >>> > > >>>> On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support > > >>>>> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver > > >>>>> for this platform. > > >>>> > > >>>> Gentle Ping. Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant > > >>>> patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos > > >>>> mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)? > > >> > > >> Sorry I thought I already Acked an older version of this set and so > > >> didn't went for it again. Done now. > > >> > > >>> Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this > > >>> approach when Thomas posted. > > >>> > > >>>> Also what is your > > >>>> preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would > > >>>> be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of > > >>>> git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)? > > >>>> > > >>> I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I > > >>> think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the > > >>> smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or > > >>> Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic > > >>> branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way. > > >>> > > >>> Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that? > > >> > > >> For cpufreq subsystem changes, you can take them in your tree. > > >> > > > Hi Viresh, OK, I will take the cpufreq changes with your ack. Thanks for > > > your confirmation. > > > > > > Hi Mike and Sylwester, > > > How can we handle this series well without any problems? hmm... > > > > > Still I need to get clock guys' ack or any comments on this series... > > > > - Kukjin > > > > >>>> I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are > > >>>> no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)... > > >>>> > > >>> Sure, why not :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |