On 12 June 2015 at 17:25, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Emil, > > Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 10 June 2015 at 14:42, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> It doesn't make sense to keep this structure, since we >>> can just call all tests directly. >>> >> Seems like it was designed in mind of having another test case. >> Perhaps the exynos guys cannot really upstream it (licensing or other >> issues) ? > might be. But why should we care about that anyway? > Would be nice to avoid giving the guys the finger considering they don't have much time to dedicate to libdrm_exynos. For all we know all of the issues (if any) are resolved and they're dusting off the patches, as we speak. > My personal guess: Big giant code bomb which noone bothered to check. ;) > Perhaps somewhere around rev 4 (of 20) it was used, and after that people just forgot about it :-P Cheers, Emil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |